Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-03-09 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, with an 82.6 score against 82.5. Galaxy S25's design is lighter and a lot thinner than the LG V30S ThinQ. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 has an older 14 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Galaxy S25 has a better looking screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixel density and a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior processor than Galaxy S25, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy S25 has superior battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a lot better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy S25 is also cheaper than the LG V30S ThinQ.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.