Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 global score. The Galaxy S25 is a way thinner and a lot lighter cellphone than LG V35 ThinQ. Galaxy S25 has a much better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger display.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy S25 counts with a way better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy S25 has greater battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21% greater battery size.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.