Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's global score of 81.2. Galaxy S25's design is a lot lighter and a lot thinner than LG V40 ThinQ. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 has 14 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, giving a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a brighter display than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, a lot lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller screen. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ features an extremely better CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 has a way better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger back camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S25 features greater battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V40 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S25, else you can save some money and buy the LG V40 ThinQ, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.