Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-20 |
| -- | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.72 ounces |
| -- | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S25's score of 82.6. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but LG V60 ThinQ has older 11 version while Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. The LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior performance than Galaxy S25. Both of them have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel amount in each screen inch. LG V60 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ has greater battery duration than Galaxy S25, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Galaxy S25 has a greater camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lot less MP resolution camera and a worse video quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a bigger sensor taking better quality photographs and videos.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG V60 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.