Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy S25's 82.6 global score. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels per inch in the display.
LG Velvet features an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. LG Velvet features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S25 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a more MP camera in the back, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a way bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos. LG Velvet features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
LG Velvet is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.