Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-09-08 |
| -- | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.00 ounces |
| -- | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's overall score of 80.9. Galaxy S25's design is noticeably lighter and notably thinner than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has 14 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version, providing you some additional features.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a processing unit that is very similar to the processing unit in Samsung Galaxy S25, and although the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has an inferior number of cores, they both have a 8 GB RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a slightly better display than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with much more brightness and a just a little higher quantity of pixels per display inch.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Samsung Galaxy S25, both of them have equal internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S25, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor and a much higher 200 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features better battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.