Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-08-29 |
| -- | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having an 82.6 score against 81.9. These devices include the same Android 14 OS. Samsung Galaxy S25's design is a lot lighter and notably thinner than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a quite larger screen, a bit brighter screen, a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch of display and a quite better resolution of 1256 x 2760px.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo's processor is very similar to the Galaxy S25 one, they have a 8 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S25 shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and a camera in the back with a 50 megapixels resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a way higher video definition.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.