Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| -- | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy S25's overall score of 82.6. Both of these devices include the same Android 14 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's processing unit is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy S25 one, and although the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has more RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixel quantity in each screen inch and a brighter display. Samsung Galaxy S25 features just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality photographs and a way tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a lot better video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy S25, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.