Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| -- | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than Galaxy S25, having a global score of 87.1 against 82.6. These phones work with the same Android 14 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features. Galaxy S25 counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little more screen brightness.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S25 and the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra both have really similar processors, and although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has more RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 has a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture and a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.