Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-12-07 |
| -- | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.48 ounces |
| -- | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than Moto G 5G's 81.5 global score. Galaxy S25 is a noticeably thinner and incredibly lighter phone than Moto G 5G. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS, but Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version while Moto G 5G has Android 10 version.
Moto G 5G has a much better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S25 features a much sharper screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel count per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a superior camera than Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a higher resolution back-facing camera and a much higher video resolution. Moto G 5G has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Moto G 5G counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy S25, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.