Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-16 |
| -- | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 general score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 has a more recent 14 version and Moto G Power has Android 11 version, providing lots of additional features and optimized performance. The Galaxy S25 construction is noticeably thinner and incredibly lighter than the Moto G Power.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels in each inch of screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G Power has a bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Power features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S25 captures a lot better videos and photos than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Power. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto G Power, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.