Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-12-20 |
| -- | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than Moto G51 5G, getting a overall score of 82.6 against 77.8. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 has newer 14 version and Moto G51 5G has Android 11, so it gives some additional features. The Galaxy S25 is a thinner and a lot lighter phone than Moto G51 5G.
Motorola Moto G51 5G features a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much more vibrant screen than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels amount per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a better camera than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a lot better video quality. Moto G51 5G counts with a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G51 5G features greater battery duration than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.