Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-28 |
| -- | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 7.05 ounces |
| -- | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G9 Play's overall score of 76.7. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has a more recent 14 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10, providing the user a couple additional features. Samsung Galaxy S25's construction is notably lighter and incredibly thinner than Motorola Moto G9 Play.
Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy S25 counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a way better count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy S25 features a better camera than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, it also counts with a camera with more MP, a way better video quality and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality. The Moto G9 Play counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play features longer battery performance than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.