Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-07 |
| -- | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 7.88 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Moto G9 Plus's 80.5 global score. Galaxy S25 is a incredibly lighter and a lot thinner cellphone than the Moto G9 Plus. Both devices we compare here have Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 has newer 14 version and Moto G9 Plus has Android 10 version, so it gives lots of additional features.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a way better display than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Moto G9 Plus has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Moto G9 Plus counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G9 Plus also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G9 Plus counts with superior battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a camera in the back with much less MP, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.