Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-09-01 |
| -- | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than Moto Z Force, with a general score of 82.6 against 75.8. Galaxy S25's body is a lot thinner and incredibly lighter than Moto Z Force. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S25 has an older 14 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Galaxy S25 has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit inferior pixels quantity per display inch and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. Moto Z Force has a lot better performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S25 captures much better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a way more megapixels camera in the back and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 14% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Force. If you want to save some money, you can get the Moto Z Force, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.