Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-06-29 |
| -- | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| -- | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Play, having an 82.6 score against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a notably lighter and a lot thinner phone than the Moto Z2 Play. The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a little greater screen pixel density, a quite larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Moto Z2 Play counts with a much greater performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Moto Z2 Play counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S25 features a lot better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 50 MP resolution and a way higher video quality. Galaxy S25 has longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 33% greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S25, else you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.