Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-08-16 |
| -- | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Moto Z3, getting an 82.6 score against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy S25's body is notably thinner and notably lighter than the Moto Z3. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Moto Z3 has a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a sharper screen than Moto Z3, because it has a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a little bit larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z3 has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S25 counts with better battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S25 features a very superior camera than Moto Z3, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot larger sensor, a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger aperture.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z3. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Moto Z3, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.