Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-29 |
| -- | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, getting an 82.6 score against 76.3. Samsung Galaxy S25's design is incredibly thinner and a lot lighter than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much better display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little larger display, a little bit better number of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Moto Z3 Play features a much better hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Moto Z3 Play features a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S25 has better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Galaxy S25 takes way better videos and photos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a much more mega-pixels camera and a lot higher video definition.
The Galaxy S25 costs a lot more than Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.