Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| -- | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.30 ounces |
| -- | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is slightly better than the Galaxy S25, with an 84.6 score against 82.6. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a more vivid display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher display density.
The Motorola One 5G has an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking pictures or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures, a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One 5G counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Motorola One 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.