Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2021-01-14 |
| -- | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.48 ounces |
| -- | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than the Motorola One 5G Ace, getting a score of 82.6 against 81.6. Galaxy S25 is a a lot thinner and incredibly lighter device than Motorola One 5G Ace. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy S25 has a way better looking display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little better screen pixel density. The Motorola One 5G Ace has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy S25 features a better camera than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a higher 50 mega pixels resolution back camera and a much higher video quality. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One 5G Ace. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S25, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.