Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-08-16 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Motorola One Action, having a global score of 82.6 against 78.5. Galaxy S25's construction is notably lighter and incredibly thinner than the Motorola One Action. Motorola One Action features an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola One Action, although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display and a quite smaller display. Motorola One Action has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 14% more battery size. The Galaxy S25 features a much better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a back camera with much more megapixels and a much higher video definition.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Action. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola One Action, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.