Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-04 |
| -- | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.05 ounces |
| -- | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper, having an 82.6 score against 79.8. Galaxy S25 is a way thinner and a lot lighter device than Motorola One Hyper. These devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 has 14 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11, providing the user some extra features and performance enhancements.
The Motorola One Hyper features a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 has a much more vibrant display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density.
Galaxy S25 captures clearer photographs and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much less megapixels camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and a lot better video quality. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper features a battery lifetime that is just as good as Galaxy S25's battery lifetime.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Hyper. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S25, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola One Hyper, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.