Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-05-15 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the Motorola One Vision's 80.7 overall score. The Galaxy S25 is a notably lighter and noticeably thinner cellphone than Motorola One Vision. Motorola One Vision features a very superior CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy S25 has a brighter screen than Motorola One Vision, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little worse number of pixels per display inch and a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution. Motorola One Vision features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher video resolution, a camera with a better resolution and a much bigger sensor. Galaxy S25 counts with just a little better battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.