Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-09-05 |
| -- | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the Motorola One Zoom's 80 global score. Galaxy S25's body is noticeably lighter and way thinner than Motorola One Zoom. The Galaxy S25 features an incredibly better display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a little greater pixels density.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with much more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Zoom also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 128 GB. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back facing camera with more mega-pixels and a lot larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos.
The Motorola One Zoom has a battery duration that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S25's battery lifetime.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Zoom. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola One Zoom, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.