Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is slightly better than Galaxy S25's 82.6 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version and Galaxy S25 has Android 14. Motorola razr (2020) features an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S25. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a quite higher screen density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Galaxy S25 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking photographs in low light environments, it also counts with a way larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality, a more megapixels back-facing camera and a much better video resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S25 counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S25, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S25. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Galaxy S25, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.