Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 15 |
| -- | 2025-04-24 |
| -- | 7.02 ounces |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 416 pixels per inch | -- |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with an 82.6 score against 79.2. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 has the previous 14 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has much less brightness and a quite smaller display. The Galaxy S25 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025). Both have the same aperture, a back camera with a 50 MP, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.