Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-16 |
| -- | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 7.58 ounces |
| -- | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. Galaxy S25 is a a lot lighter and noticeably thinner cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 has the previous 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a just a bit higher pixels number per inch of screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior processing unit than Galaxy S25, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25, because it has more internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has a 25% more battery capacity. The Galaxy S25 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a more mega-pixels back facing camera, a way larger back camera sensor and higher 30 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy S25 costs more than nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.