Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-02 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.82 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A30, with a general score of 82.6 against 79.6. The Galaxy S25 construction is thinner and incredibly lighter than Samsung Galaxy A30. The Galaxy A30 features a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy S25 features a much better display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a quite greater display density. Galaxy S25 features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing images and video in low light environments, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A30 has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A30's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery duration in Samsung Galaxy S25.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.