Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-27 |
| -- | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is a little bit better than Galaxy A31, with an 82.6 score against 81.3. The Galaxy S25 body is incredibly thinner and incredibly lighter than Galaxy A31. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 has 14 version while Galaxy A31 has Android 10 version, offering some nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixel density.
The Galaxy A31 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A31 has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S25 captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A31, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and video, a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a back-facing camera with a better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.