Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-01-13 |
| -- | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.61 ounces |
| -- | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s global score of 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017). The Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a lot better processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy S25 counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy S25 has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S25 features superior battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Galaxy S25 captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger aperture for better low-light images and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.