Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than Galaxy S25, getting a 91.3 score against 82.6. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 has a better display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater count of pixels in each display inch. Galaxy S25 captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.