Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-05-22 |
| -- | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Galaxy A6, getting a general score of 82.6 against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a incredibly lighter and thinner phone than Galaxy A6. The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a better pixel density, a bit larger screen and a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A6 features a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features longer battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way better video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S25, else you can save some money and get the Galaxy A6, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.