Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-01-13 |
| -- | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s 75.8 score. The Galaxy S25 construction is extremely thinner and noticeably lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017). Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a lot better screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a quite better screen density, a little bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy S25 has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a much better video definition, a back facing camera with much more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations. The Galaxy S25 features a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.