Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-26 |
| -- | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's general score of 76.9. Galaxy S25's body is way lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A70. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS, but Galaxy S25 has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10, so it provides the user some extra features and performance enhancements.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S25 features a much better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little better display density.
The Galaxy S25 shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light images, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs. Samsung Galaxy A70 has much more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A70. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A70, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.