Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-02-22 |
| -- | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S25's score of 82.6. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14. Galaxy F62 has a much greater performance than Galaxy S25, although it has 2 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores.
Galaxy S25 has a sharper display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a way brighter display and a just a little higher display density. Galaxy S25 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy F62, because although it has a camera with a lot worse resolution, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has a 75% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.