Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-27 |
| -- | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.74 ounces |
| -- | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is better than the Galaxy S25's 82.6 general score. Both devices we are comparing here use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy S25 has Android 14, offering a couple nice extra features. Galaxy Fold counts with a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density. The Galaxy S25 captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way better video resolution, a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a much bigger camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy Fold has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Fold is way more expensive than the Galaxy S25, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.