Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2019-03-07 |
| -- | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than the Galaxy M30, with a overall score of 82.6 against 82.4. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has the previous 14 version while Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy S25's construction is much thinner and much lighter than Galaxy M30.
Galaxy M30 features a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 features a way better looking display than Galaxy M30, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better screen pixels density and a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
Galaxy S25 captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy M30, because it has a way higher video quality, a bigger camera aperture, a lot more megapixels camera and a much larger sensor taking much higher quality photographs. The Galaxy M30 features a superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M30 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 features better battery duration than Galaxy S25, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.