Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-11 |
| -- | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.51 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 416 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is a little bit better than the Galaxy S25, having a global score of 87.7 against 82.6. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy M51 has older 10 version and Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy M51 has a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a just a little greater display pixel density. Galaxy M51 features a much better storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy M51 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a lot less MP resolution back facing camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a much higher video quality and a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy M51 has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.