Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than the Galaxy S25, having a score of 98.9 against 82.6. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy S25 has a better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little smaller screen and a bit lower number of pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a larger sensor shooting better quality photos and videos.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than Galaxy S25, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.