Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-07-07 |
| -- | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 score. The Galaxy S25 construction is way lighter and noticeably thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a just a little worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a slightly better memory for games and applications than Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy S25 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much larger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos. Samsung Galaxy S25 features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs more money than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy Note Fan Edition. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy S25, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.