Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| -- | 2013-09-25 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, having a score of 82.6 against 77.7. The Galaxy S25 construction is noticeably thinner and extremely lighter than Samsung Galaxy Note3. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 has the previous 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy S25 features a much sharper screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a little more pixels per inch of display, a little bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340. Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM.
Galaxy S25 features just a bit more memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has improved battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S25 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, a much larger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality, a way higher video resolution and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.