Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-08-02 |
| -- | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note7, with an 82.6 score against 79.5. The Galaxy S25 is a extremely thinner and way lighter phone than Galaxy Note7. The Galaxy Note7 counts with a way better hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The Galaxy S25 shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a way larger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy S25 has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.