Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| -- | 2014-06-23 |
| -- | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 global score. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. Galaxy S25 is a notably thinner and notably lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport.
Galaxy S25 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Galaxy S25 has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor. Galaxy S25 features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a way larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a lot better video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 43% bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.