Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| -- | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7's 79.5 overall score. Galaxy S25 is a incredibly lighter and a lot thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy S7. Samsung Galaxy S7 has a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and less RAM.
The Galaxy S25 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S7, because although it has a way lower pixels quantity per screen inch and a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a larger screen and a much brighter display. Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way more mega pixels camera, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has superior battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S7. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S25, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy S7, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.