Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-06-10 |
| -- | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. Galaxy S25's body is a lot lighter and thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S25 features just a bit better display than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot lesser pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen and way more brightness.
Galaxy S25 counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM and less cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S25 and the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active both have extremely similar batteries performance.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S7 Active. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Galaxy S7 Active, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.