Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| -- | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than the Galaxy S25, with a global score of 88.5 against 82.6. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version and Galaxy S25 has Android 14. The Galaxy S25 has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit worse display density.
Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip has a much faster processor than Galaxy S25. Both have 8 cpu cores and a 8 GB RAM. Galaxy S25 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy S25 counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent more battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S25, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S25. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy S25, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.