Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-07 |
| -- | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is better than Galaxy S25's 82.6 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version while Galaxy S25 has Android 14. Galaxy S25 has a better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a just a little worse screen density.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25. Both have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a back facing camera with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy S25 has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21% larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.