Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| -- | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S25, having a 94.6 score against 82.6. Both phones we are comparing here have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a brighter display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a lot better performance than Galaxy S25, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a way better resolution back facing camera, a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little longer battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S25, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S25. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy S25, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.