Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-05 |
| -- | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.68 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the Xperia XZs's score of 77.2. The Galaxy S25 design is extremely thinner and notably lighter than the Xperia XZs. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a more vivid screen than Xperia XZs, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel quantity per display inch, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bigger screen.
The Sony Xperia XZs counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and lesser RAM memory. The Sony Xperia XZs counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a way tinier sensor providing a lot lower image quality, a smaller aperture, a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution and a lot lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a bigger memory to install games and applications than Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 has a really longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 costs a bit more money than Sony Xperia XZs, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.