Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-04-20 |
| -- | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark's general score of 80.4. The Samsung Galaxy S25 design is thinner and noticeably lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version and Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a brighter screen than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch of screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and much more screen brightness. The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25. They have a Octa-Core processor and 8 GB of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark and Galaxy S25 count with similar memory capacity for applications and games, they have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark features a battery life that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy S25's battery life. The Galaxy S25 captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a much higher video resolution, a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.